
PORN TITLES TAKEN FROM A LIST SOME GUY POSTED TO USENET, PART II
Some times when I write the Ratings, I look up information about
whatever it is I'm writing about, the better to seem erudite and
to tie it in somehow with old G.I. Joe cartoons. Sometimes, however,
I don't look up any information, the better to preserve my sanity.
I'm pretty sure I know what a footjob gangbang is, but that little
shard of uncertainty is precious to me, and I preserve it like
a former debutante saving a slice of her wedding cake. At any rate,
the world's biggest footjob gangbang seems like one of those records
you set primarily by virtue of nobody else caring. I find it difficult
to believe that American, French, and Chinese footjob gangbang teams were
all vying for the title and the glory. I bet it was just some people
and some feet. C+
This is a disappointing title. I've come to expect either half-assed
mainstream movie parody titles ("Citizen Came") or uncomfortably
anatomical descriptions of sex acts that I never would have come up
with on my own ("Calling All Nostril Rimmers #3"). This is definitely
a porn title, so I don't think it's the 1976 film featuring a pre-WKRP
Howard Hesseman. Now that I think about it, "Tunnelvision" could be
a slang term for any number of potentially uncomfortable sex
practices. And now to stop thinking about it. C-
Oh, give it up. If you have the power of self-delusion that
allows you to believe that every female orgasm on a porn DVD is real
because, you know, it says so, you may as well rent "Girls
Who Are Lesbians Except They Would Totally Do You If You Lived In
Ventura For Free Even #12." Or, save yourself the trouble, just tell
yourself that sixteen sex-starved coffee shop baristas just knocked
down your door and boffed you to within an inch of your life then
departed leaving nothing but two pounds of Kona, because
that's precisely as likely. C-
It seems kind of presumptuous to call a porn flick "#1." I thought
"The First Pokémon Movie" was taking a gamble, but this is
really tenuous. How can you be
sure that Lewd Conduct is going to be popular enough
to warrant a sequel? Especially with a feeble title like that.
"Lewd Conduct" is barely suggestive enough to make a Victorian
governess reach for the smelling salts.
In a world with porn titles like "Assault That Ass" and "Cum
Drippers #3," "Lewd Conduct" sounds like something involving
underarm body noises and maybe, maybe some light mooning. D+
I can't decide which word in this title I like least. There's
definitely some synergy going on here; the title taken as a whole is
disturbing enough to make me wonder if there isn't something
fundamentally wrong with heterosexuality. This is like when
you're eight and you see a movie about something stupid like
giant voles and it takes you the better part of a decade to get
over your vole fear. I'm not entirely sure what a snatch attack
is, but I'm definitely worried that it might happen to me. I'm
equally worried that Pussyman will somehow be involved. I'm sure
before too long I'll be walking down a dark deserted street and
I'll start walking faster because I can't be entirely sure that
Pussyman isn't nearby with a snatch attack on his mind. D-